Non-Immigrant Visas
Frequently Asked Questions
Non-Immigrant Visa Refusals
In most cases, non-immigrant visa applicants must
demonstrate to a consular officer and a Department of
Homeland Security (hereafter referred to as DHS) that
they qualify for a visa according to Section 214(b) of
the U.S. Immigration and Nationality Act (INA).
Section 214(b) states that:
"Every alien shall be presumed to be an immigrant
until he establishes to the satisfaction of the consular
officer, at the time of application for a admission, he
is entitled to a Non-Immigrant status."
In other words, U.S. law presumes that everyone who
applies for a non-immigrant visa is an intending
immigrant. Thus, most applicants must overcome Section
214(b) by demonstrating that:
- The purpose of their trip is to enter the United
States solely for business, pleasure or medical
treatment;
- They have made clear their true intentions in
traveling to the United States;
- They do not intend to work while in the United
States, unless they have been granted DHS approval
for a temporary work visa;
- They plan to stay for a specific, limited
period;
- They have evidence of funds to cover all
expenses while in the United States;
- They have evidence of compelling social and
economic ties abroad; and
- They have a residence outside the United States
as well as other binding ties that will ensure their
return abroad at the end of the visit.
When a consular officer determines that an applicant
cannot overcome this legal presumption, s/he is usually
refused under Section 214(b).

The consular officer who refused your visa is highly
trained. During a short interview, the consular officer
looks at several aspects of your case: your situation in
Malaysia, your stated intent in visiting the United
States, your previous travel history, your financial
situation, and many other factors. Based upon the unique
circumstances of your case, the consular officer asked
you the questions he/she deemed necessary to elicit
relevant information. The consular officer weighed your
answers to those questions with the other facts of your
case.

Consular officers handle over 30,000 applications
every year. Because of this experience, they are able to
quickly review the application form and supporting
documents in order determine the range of questions to
ask. Keep in mind, most of the information we need is
already supplied on the application form itself, so
there is usually no need for the officer to ask more
than a few additional questions. We often need only to
verify your identity or clear up one or two points.
Also, if the interview were longer, you would end up
waiting in line for a considerably longer time. In order
to be fair to all applicants and to provide everyone an
equal opportunity to establish eligibility, we must work
quickly and efficiently.

The problem is not the documents. Rather, your
current overall situation (as supported by those
documents) was not adequate to overcome the presumption
that you are an intending immigrant. Applying for a
non-immigrant visa is
not a documentary process--consular officers
never rely solely upon them as they do not establish an
applicant's intentions. Documents that demonstrate that
an applicant is well established in his/her own country
can, in some circumstances, help to show an individual’s
intent to return to his/her own country after a
temporary stay in the United States. Depending on the
specifics of your case, the consular officer may or may
not have needed to examine your documents closely to
make a decision about your eligibility for a visa. You
were correct to bring documents with you, in case the
consular officer needed to refer to them. If the
consular officer made a decision in your case without a
detailed scrutiny of your documents, it was because
other circumstances of your case were clear. If your
visa was refused, it is highly unlikely that any
document you could provide would significantly alter the
consular officer’s decision about your case.

No. An applicant can choose to reapply--there are no
special reapplication procedures. However, due to the
cost of the application fee, reapplying is not
recommended unless the applicant's situation truly has
changed markedly since that refusal. Keep in mind that
simply reapplying in the days or weeks following a
214(b) refusal will likely lead to another refusal. If a
decision is made to reapply, applicants are advised to
submit additional information that may overcome the
reason(s) for the prior refusal.

The USD 100 that you paid is an application fee. The
application instructions state clearly that this fee is
non-refundable whether or not you qualify for a U.S.
visa. We have no authority to refund an application fee.

Every application for a visa is evaluated on its own
merits. Before an application is presented, it is only
possible to give general information regarding the visa
application process and suggest the types of documents
that might help you to demonstrate your eligibility for
a U.S. visa. The visa application instructions clearly
state that there is no guarantee that you will receive a
U.S. visa if you choose to apply.

The approved I-20 is just one of many factors the
consular officer must consider in deciding whether a
visa may be issued. Remember, Section 214(b) applies to
student applications. Thus, every student must satisfy
the consular officer that they will depart the United
States after finishing their studies, which may take
several years. Consequently, your overall circumstances
are taken into account when deciding whether to issue a
student visa. Student visas must be denied if it appears
that the student cannot or will not complete a full
course of study in the United States.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), section
222(f), the records of the Department of State relating
to visa decisions are confidential, and therefore
information may not be provided to third parties about a
particular visa applicant. Certain information may be
provided to the petitioner in visa cases, attorneys
representing a visa applicant, or to members of
Congress, or other persons acting on behalf of and with
the permission of the applicant.
For visa denials, the law requires that almost all visa
applicants be informed verbally and in writing the basis
for the denial. This explanation always relates to a
specific section of the INA.

|